The value of unimportance

Waste Land

Image by Jitterousperth via Flickr

I recently wrote in a discussion of cyber-surveillance that any veil of anonymity can be pierced for a price, so my anonymity is only commensurate with my unimportance. Unimportance. That got me to thinking about my search for a piece of land in the early 70’s and what that taught me about the value of unimportance. All I could afford was marginal land, land that was ignored or rejected by people with more money. It gave me a new perspective on “the waste land”. As I think T. S. Elliot suggests in his poem of that name, there is often good in what we tend to take for bad and vice versa.

APRIL is the cruellest month, breeding
Lilacs out of the dead land, mixing
Memory and desire, stirring
Dull roots with spring rain.
Winter kept us warm, covering
Earth in forgetful snow, feeding
A little life with dried tubers.

The most frequent use of the term “marginal land” that I find is in relation to plant habitats. This or that will grow on marginal land. What one notices about plants that thrive on marginal lands is that most of them are “weeds”. The weeds of humanity are the peasants, paupers, and peons. I suspect that if the meek really do inherit the earth some day, it will be the marginal parts of the earth– the waste land, the junk yards, the garbage dumps, the forests that grew around nuclear plants that melted down…

If the meek inherit the earth, it will probably happen because the rich and powerful have inherited the wind. (Proverbs 11:29,  “He that troubleth his own house shall inherit the wind.”)

Is Paradise hiding behind the palisades of the wealthy, or are those gated communities more likely the gates of hell? I think the real Paradise is hidden in plain sight. Paradise for weeds is the waste land. And that is the value of unimportance.

Poor Richard


9 Responses to “The value of unimportance”

  1. Jon Awbrey Says:


    • Poor Richard Says:

      Thanks, Jon. I think I recall your name from Wikipedia Review. I like your wiki page. I am interested in something I’d call “non-authoritarian information quality control” in the digital world. Non-authoritarian control sounds pretty oxymoronic, so I sometimes amend it to quality “assurance”. Wikipedia seems like an interesting laboratory for this topic. Have you written about strategies to achieve high quality/confidence in digital media?

  2. Lori Says:

    Proles and animals are free.

    • Poor Richard Says:

      They should be, Lori, but sadly nothing and no one on this planet is free from the consequences of authoritarian pathology.

  3. Natural Lefty Says:

    I like the humility of this post. I think those who or that which appear unimportant in the eyes of humanity often turn out to be the really important ones. We humans are horrible judges of value when we get together and create a society.

    • Poor Richard Says:

      Thanks, NL. Well said.

  4. Natural Lefty Says:

    Oh, there is something I have always wanted to ask you. Do you really look like Ben Franklin?

    • Poor Richard Says:

      Yes, NL, but I am not as fat as Franklin was at my age (a consequence of my small fixed income, perhaps).

  5. 61-Romance with your unimportance; you could become free | Style 40 Says:

    […] The value of unimportance ( […]

Leave a Reply

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in: Logo

You are commenting using your account. Log Out /  Change )

Google+ photo

You are commenting using your Google+ account. Log Out /  Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out /  Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out /  Change )


Connecting to %s

%d bloggers like this: